Last data update: May 06, 2024. (Total: 46732 publications since 2009)
Records 1-30 (of 183 Records) |
Query Trace: Hicks P[original query] |
---|
Newer pharmacologic treatments in adults with type 2 diabetes: A clinical guideline from the American College of Physicians
Qaseem A , Obley AJ , Shamliyan T , Hicks LA , Harrod CS , Crandall CJ . Ann Intern Med 2024 DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this clinical guideline to update recommendations on newer pharmacologic treatments of type 2 diabetes. This clinical guideline is based on the best available evidence for effectiveness, comparative benefits and harms, consideration of patients' values and preferences, and costs. METHODS: This clinical guideline is based on a systematic review of the effectiveness and harms of newer pharmacologic treatments of type 2 diabetes, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, a GLP-1 agonist and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide agonist, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and long-acting insulins, used either as monotherapy or in combination with other medications. The Clinical Guidelines Committee prioritized the following outcomes, which were evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach: all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, progression of chronic kidney disease, serious adverse events, and severe hypoglycemia. Weight loss, as measured by percentage of participants who achieved at least 10% total body weight loss, was a prioritized outcome, but data were insufficient for network meta-analysis and were not rated with GRADE. AUDIENCE AND PATIENT POPULATION: The audience for this clinical guideline is physicians and other clinicians. The population is nonpregnant adults with type 2 diabetes. RECOMMENDATION 1: ACP recommends adding a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist to metformin and lifestyle modifications in adults with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (strong recommendation; high-certainty evidence). • Use an SGLT-2 inhibitor to reduce the risk for all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, progression of chronic kidney disease, and hospitalization due to congestive heart failure. • Use a GLP-1 agonist to reduce the risk for all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and stroke. RECOMMENDATION 2: ACP recommends against adding a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor to metformin and lifestyle modifications in adults with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control to reduce morbidity and all-cause mortality (strong recommendation; high-certainty evidence). |
Description of antibiotic use variability among US nursing homes using electronic health record data
Kabbani S , Wang SW , Ditz LL , Gouin KA , Palms D , Rowe TA , Hyun DY , Chi NW , Stone ND , Hicks LA . Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 12/28/2021 1 (1) e58 BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are frequently prescribed in nursing homes; national data describing facility-level antibiotic use are lacking. The objective of this analysis was to describe variability in antibiotic use in nursing homes across the United States using electronic health record orders. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of antibiotic orders for 309,884 residents in 1,664 US nursing homes in 2016 were included in the analysis. Antibiotic use rates were calculated as antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 resident days and were compared by type of stay (short stay ≤100 days vs long stay >100 days). Prescribing indications and the duration of nursing home-initiated antibiotic orders were described. Facility-level correlations of antibiotic use, adjusting for resident health and facility characteristics, were assessed using multivariate linear regression models. RESULTS: In 2016, 54% of residents received at least 1 systemic antibiotic. The overall rate of antibiotic use was 88 DOT per 1,000 resident days. The 3 most common antibiotic classes prescribed were fluoroquinolones (18%), cephalosporins (18%), and urinary anti-infectives (9%). Antibiotics were most frequently prescribed for urinary tract infections, and the median duration of an antibiotic course was 7 days (interquartile range, 5-10). Higher facility antibiotic use rates correlated positively with higher proportions of short-stay residents, for-profit ownership, residents with low cognitive performance, and having at least 1 resident on a ventilator. Available facility-level characteristics only predicted a small proportion of variability observed (Model R(2) version 0.24 software). CONCLUSIONS: Using electronic health record orders, variability was found among US nursing-home antibiotic prescribing practices, highlighting potential opportunities for targeted improvement of prescribing practices. |
Leveraging Health Systems to Expand and Enhance Antibiotic Stewardship in Outpatient Settings
Rodzik RH , Buckel WR , Hersh AL , Hicks LA , Neuhauser MM , Stenehjem EA , Hyun DY , Zetts RM . Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2024 50 (4) 289-295 The widespread implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs across all health care settings is critical to slow the development of antibiotic resistance and ensure that patients receive the best medical care. Currently, most hospitals and long-term care facilities have reported implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs (95.0% of hospitals and 76.6% of long-term care facilities in 2021).1,2 However, more work is needed to expand antibiotic stewardship efforts into outpatient health care practices—including primary care, urgent care, and retail clinics, and within care provided through telemedicine services. These health care settings account for the majority of antibiotics prescribed in the United States, and previous studies have shown high rates of inappropriate prescribing.3., 4., 5., 6. | | Successful outpatient antibiotic stewardship implementation requires a coordinated effort between a diverse group of health care stakeholders to ensure that individual practices and clinicians have the resources and support they need to improve their prescribing practices. One key stakeholder group with the ability to support stewardship expansion into outpatient practices is health systems. Health care delivery in the United States has become increasingly consolidated, with one study finding that around 72% of hospitals and 49% of primary care physicians were affiliated with health systems in 2018.7 Health systems offer the ability to provide resources and infrastructure that can support antibiotic stewardship efforts across multiple outpatient practices. |
Outpatient visits and antibiotic use due to higher valency pneumococcal vaccine serotypes
King LM , Andrejko KL , Kabbani S , Tartof SY , Hicks LA , Cohen AL , Kobayashi M , Lewnard JA . J Infect Dis 2024 BACKGROUND: In 2022-2023, 15- and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV15/PCV20) were recommended for infants. We aimed to estimate the incidence of outpatient visits and antibiotic prescriptions in U.S. children (≤17 years) from 2016-2019 for acute otitis media, pneumonia, and sinusitis associated with PCV15- and PCV20-additional (non-PCV13) serotypes to quantify PCV15/20 potential impacts. METHODS: We estimated the incidence of PCV15/20-additional serotype-attributable visits and antibiotic prescriptions as the product of all-cause incidence rates, derived from national healthcare surveys and MarketScan databases, and PCV15/20-additional serotype-attributable fractions. We estimated serotype-specific attributable fractions using modified vaccine-probe approaches incorporating incidence changes post-PCV13 and ratios of PCV13 versus PCV15/20 serotype frequencies, estimated through meta-analyses. RESULTS: Per 1000 children annually, PCV15-additional serotypes accounted for an estimated 2.7 (95% confidence interval 1.8-3.9) visits and 2.4 (1.6-3.4) antibiotic prescriptions. PCV20-additional serotypes resulted in 15.0 (11.2-20.4) visits and 13.2 (9.9-18.0) antibiotic prescriptions annually per 1,000 children. PCV15/20-additional serotypes account for 0.4% (0.2-0.6%) and 2.1% (1.5-3.0%) of pediatric outpatient antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PCV15-additional serotypes, PCV20-additional serotypes account for >5 times the burden of visits and antibiotic prescriptions. Higher-valency PCVs, especially PCV20, may contribute to preventing pediatric pneumococcal respiratory infections and antibiotic use. |
Length of antibiotic therapy among adults hospitalized with uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia, 2013-2020
McCarthy NL , Baggs J , Wolford H , Kazakova SV , Kabbani S , Attell BK , Neuhauser MM , Walker L , Yi SH , Hatfield KM , Reddy S , Hicks LA . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2024 1-7 OBJECTIVE: The 2014 US National Strategy for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (CARB) aimed to reduce inappropriate inpatient antibiotic use by 20% for monitored conditions, such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), by 2020. We evaluated annual trends in length of therapy (LOT) in adults hospitalized with uncomplicated CAP from 2013 through 2020. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among adults with a primary diagnosis of bacterial or unspecified pneumonia using International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Revision codes in MarketScan and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services databases. We included patients with length of stay (LOS) of 2-10 days, discharged home with self-care, and not rehospitalized in the 3 days following discharge. We estimated inpatient LOT based on LOS from the PINC AI Healthcare Database. The total LOT was calculated by summing estimated inpatient LOT and actual postdischarge LOT. We examined trends from 2013 to 2020 in patients with total LOT >7 days, which was considered an indicator of likely excessive LOT. RESULTS: There were 44,976 and 400,928 uncomplicated CAP hospitalizations among patients aged 18-64 years and ≥65 years, respectively. From 2013 to 2020, the proportion of patients with total LOT >7 days decreased by 25% (68% to 51%) among patients aged 18-64 years and by 27% (68%-50%) among patients aged ≥65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although likely excessive LOT for uncomplicated CAP patients decreased since 2013, the proportion of patients treated with LOT >7 days still exceeded 50% in 2020. Antibiotic stewardship programs should continue to pursue interventions to reduce likely excessive LOT for common infections. |
Advancing health equity through action in antimicrobial stewardship and healthcare epidemiology
Marcelin JR , Hicks LA , Evans CD , Wiley Z , Kalu IC , Abdul-Mutakabbir JC . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2024 1-8 |
Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on HIV outcomes in the United States: A modeling study
Viguerie A , Jacobson EU , Hicks KA , Bates L , Carrico J , Honeycutt A , Lyles C , Farnham PG . Sex Transm Dis 2024 BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted sexual behaviors and the HIV continuum-of-care in the United States, reducing HIV testing and diagnosis, and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and antiretroviral therapy (ART). We aim to understand the future implications of these effects through a modeling study. METHODS: We first ran our compartmental model of HIV transmission in the US accounting for pandemic-related short-term changes in transmission behavior and HIV prevention and care provision in 2020-2021 only. We then ran a comparison scenario that did not apply pandemic effects but assumed a continuation of past HIV prevention and care trends. We compared results from the two scenarios through 2024. RESULTS: HIV incidence was 4·4% lower in 2020-21 for the pandemic scenario compared with the no-pandemic scenario due to reduced levels of transmission behavior, despite reductions in HIV prevention and care caused by the pandemic. However, reduced care led to less viral load suppression among people with HIV (PWH) in 2020 and, in turn, our model resulted in a slightly greater incidence of 2·0% from 2022-24 in the COVID-19 scenario, as compared to the non-COVID scenario. DISCUSSION: Disruptions in HIV prevention and care services during COVID-19 may lead to somewhat higher post-pandemic HIV incidence, than assuming pre-pandemic trends in HIV care and prevention continued. These results underscore the importance of continuing to increase HIV prevention and care efforts in the coming years. |
Monitoring and reporting the US COVID-19 vaccination effort
Scharf LG , Adeniyi K , Augustini E , Boyd D , Corvin L , Kalach RE , Fast H , Fath J , Harris L , Henderson D , Hicks-Thomson J , Jones-Jack N , Kellerman A , Khan AN , McGarvey SS , McGehee JE , EMiner C , Moore LB , Murthy BP , Myerburg S , Neuhaus E , Nguyen K , Parker M , Pierce-Richards S , Samchok D , Shaw LK , Spoto S , Srinivasan A , Stearle C , Thomas J , Winarsky M , Zell E . Vaccine 2023 Immunizations are an important tool to reduce the burden of vaccine preventable diseases and improve population health.(1) High-quality immunization data is essential to inform clinical and public health interventions and respond to outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. To track COVID-19 vaccines and vaccinations, CDC established an integrated network that included vaccination provider systems, health information exchange systems, immunization information systems, pharmacy and dialysis systems, vaccine ordering systems, electronic health records, and tools to support mass vaccination clinics. All these systems reported data to CDC's COVID-19 response system (either directly or indirectly) where it was processed, analyzed, and disseminated. This unprecedented vaccine tracking effort provided essential information for public health officials that was used to monitor the COVID-19 response and guide decisions. This paper will describe systems, processes, and policies that enabled monitoring and reporting of COVID-19 vaccination efforts and share challenges and lessons learned for future public health emergency responses. |
Impact of an antibiotic stewardship initiative on urgent-care respiratory prescribing across patient race, ethnicity, and language
Seibert AM , Hersh AL , Patel PK , Hicks LA , Fino N , Stanfield V , Stenehjem EA . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023 1-4 We conducted a post hoc analysis of an antibiotic stewardship intervention implemented across our health system's urgent-care network to determine whether there was a differential impact among patient groups. Respiratory urgent-care antibiotic prescribing decreased for all racial, ethnic, and preferred language groups, but disparities in antibiotic prescribing persisted. |
Antibiotic use among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the United States, March 2020-June 2022
Kim C , Wolford H , Baggs J , Reddy S , Hicks LA , Neuhauser MM , Kabbani S . Open Forum Infect Dis 2023 10 (11) ofad503 We conducted a retrospective study to describe antibiotic use among US adults hospitalized with a COVID-19 diagnosis. Despite a decrease in overall antibiotic use, most patients hospitalized with COVID-19 received antibiotics on admission (88.1%) regardless of critical care status, highlighting that more efforts are needed to optimize antibiotic therapy. |
Antibiotic stewardship in outpatient telemedicine: Adapting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention core elements to optimize antibiotic use
Sanchez GV , Kabbani S , Tsay SV , Bizune D , Hersh AL , Luciano A , Hicks LA . Telemed J E Health 2023 The rapid expansion of telemedicine has highlighted challenges and opportunities to improve antibiotic use and effectively adapt antibiotic stewardship best practices to outpatient telemedicine settings. Antibiotic stewardship integration into telemedicine is essential to optimize antibiotic prescribing for patients and ensure health care quality. We performed a narrative review of published literature on antibiotic prescribing and stewardship in outpatient telemedicine to inform the adaptation of the Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship framework to outpatient telemedicine settings. Our narrative review suggests that in-person antibiotic stewardship interventions can be adapted to outpatient telemedicine settings. We present considerations for applying the Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship to outpatient telemedicine which builds upon growing evidence describing care delivery and quality improvement in this setting. Additional applied implementation research is necessary to inform the application of effective, sustainable, and equitable antibiotic stewardship interventions across the spectrum of outpatient telemedicine. |
Defining access without excess: expanding appropriate use of antibiotics targeting multidrug-resistant organisms
Patel TS , Sati H , Lessa FC , Patel PK , Srinivasan A , Hicks LA , Neuhauser MM , Tong D , van der Heijden M , Alves SC , Getahun H , Park BJ . Lancet Microbe 2023 Antimicrobial resistance remains a significant global public health threat. Although development of novel antibiotics can be challenging, several new antibiotics with improved activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms have recently been commercialised. Expanding access to these antibiotics is a global public health priority that should be coupled with improving access to quality diagnostics, health care with adequately trained professionals, and functional antimicrobial stewardship programmes. This comprehensive approach is essential to ensure responsible use of these new antibiotics. |
Monkeypox virus-infected individuals mount comparable humoral immune responses as Smallpox-vaccinated individuals
Otter AD , Jones S , Hicks B , Bailey D , Callaby H , Houlihan C , Rampling T , Gordon NC , Selman H , Satheshkumar PS , Townsend M , Mehta R , Pond M , Jones R , Wright D , Oeser C , Tonge S , Linley E , Hemingway G , Coleman T , Millward S , Lloyd A , Damon I , Brooks T , Vipond R , Rowe C , Hallis B . Nat Commun 2023 14 (1) 5948 In early 2022, a cluster of monkeypox virus (MPXV) infection (mpox) cases were identified within the UK with no prior travel history to MPXV-endemic regions. Subsequently, case numbers exceeding 80,000 were reported worldwide, primarily affecting gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Public health agencies worldwide have offered the IMVANEX Smallpox vaccination to these individuals at high-risk to provide protection and limit the spread of MPXV. We have developed a comprehensive array of ELISAs to study poxvirus-induced antibodies, utilising 24 MPXV and 3 Vaccinia virus (VACV) recombinant antigens. Panels of serum samples from individuals with differing Smallpox-vaccine doses and those with prior MPXV infection were tested on these assays, where we observed that one dose of Smallpox vaccination induces a low number of antibodies to a limited number of MPXV antigens but increasing with further vaccination doses. MPXV infection induced similar antibody responses to diverse poxvirus antigens observed in Smallpox-vaccinated individuals. We identify MPXV A27 as a serological marker of MPXV-infection, whilst MPXV M1 (VACV L1) is likely IMVANEX-specific. Here, we demonstrate analogous humoral antigen recognition between both MPXV-infected or Smallpox-vaccinated individuals, with binding to diverse yet core set of poxvirus antigens, providing opportunities for future vaccine (e.g., mRNA) and therapeutic (e.g., mAbs) design. |
Application of a life table approach to assess duration of BNT162b2 vaccine-derived immunity by age using COVID-19 case surveillance data during the Omicron variant period
Sternberg MR , Johnson A , King J , Ali AR , Linde L , Awofeso AO , Baker JS , Bayoumi NS , Broadway S , Busen K , Chang C , Cheng I , Cima M , Collingwood A , Dorabawila V , Drenzek C , Fleischauer A , Gent A , Hartley A , Hicks L , Hoskins M , Jara A , Jones A , Khan SI , Kamal-Ahmed I , Kangas S , Kanishka F , Kleppinger A , Kocharian A , León TM , Link-Gelles R , Lyons BC , Masarik J , May A , McCormick D , Meyer S , Milroy L , Morris KJ , Nelson L , Omoike E , Patel K , Pietrowski M , Pike MA , Pilishvili T , Peterson Pompa X , Powell C , Praetorius K , Rosenberg E , Schiller A , Smith-Coronado ML , Stanislawski E , Strand K , Tilakaratne BP , Vest H , Wiedeman C , Zaldivar A , Silk B , Scobie HM . PLoS One 2023 18 (9) e0291678 BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants have the potential to impact vaccine effectiveness and duration of vaccine-derived immunity. We analyzed U.S. multi-jurisdictional COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough surveillance data to examine potential waning of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection for the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b) primary vaccination series by age. METHODS: Weekly numbers of SARS-CoV-2 infections during January 16, 2022-May 28, 2022 were analyzed by age group from 22 U.S. jurisdictions that routinely linked COVID-19 case surveillance and immunization data. A life table approach incorporating line-listed and aggregated COVID-19 case datasets with vaccine administration and U.S. Census data was used to estimate hazard rates of SARS-CoV-2 infections, hazard rate ratios (HRR) and percent reductions in hazard rate comparing unvaccinated people to people vaccinated with a Pfizer-BioNTech primary series only, by age group and time since vaccination. RESULTS: The percent reduction in hazard rates for persons 2 weeks after vaccination with a Pfizer-BioNTech primary series compared with unvaccinated persons was lowest among children aged 5-11 years at 35.5% (95% CI: 33.3%, 37.6%) compared to the older age groups, which ranged from 68.7%-89.6%. By 19 weeks after vaccination, all age groups showed decreases in the percent reduction in the hazard rates compared with unvaccinated people; with the largest declines observed among those aged 5-11 and 12-17 years and more modest declines observed among those 18 years and older. CONCLUSIONS: The decline in vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection observed in this study is consistent with other studies and demonstrates that national case surveillance data were useful for assessing early signals in age-specific waning of vaccine protection during the initial period of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant predominance. The potential for waning immunity during the Omicron period emphasizes the importance of continued monitoring and consideration of optimal timing and provision of booster doses in the future. |
Health equity and antibiotic prescribing in the United States: A systematic scoping review
Kim C , Kabbani S , Dube WC , Neuhauser M , Tsay S , Hersh A , Marcelin JR , Hicks LA . Open Forum Infect Dis 2023 10 (9) ofad440 We performed a scoping review of articles published from 1 January 2000 to 4 January 2022 to characterize inequities in antibiotic prescribing and use across healthcare settings in the United States to inform antibiotic stewardship interventions and research. We included 34 observational studies, 21 cross-sectional survey studies, 4 intervention studies, and 2 systematic reviews. Most studies (55 of 61 [90%]) described the outpatient setting, 3 articles were from dentistry, 2 were from long-term care, and 1 was from acute care. Differences in antibiotic prescribing were found by patient's race and ethnicity, sex, age, socioeconomic factors, geography, clinician's age and specialty, and healthcare setting, with an emphasis on outpatient settings. Few studies assessed stewardship interventions. Clinicians, antibiotic stewardship experts, and health systems should be aware that prescribing behavior varies according to both clinician- and patient-level markers. Prescribing differences likely represent structural inequities; however, no studies reported underlying drivers of inequities in antibiotic prescribing. |
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on inpatient antibiotic use in the United States, January 2019 through July 2022
O'Leary EN , Neuhauser MM , Srinivasan A , Dubendris H , Webb AK , Soe MM , Hicks LA , Wu H , Kabbani S , Edwards JR . Clin Infect Dis 2023 Antimicrobial use (AU) data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network's Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Module between January 2019 and July 2022 were analyzed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on inpatient antimicrobial use. |
Comparison of antibiotic prescribing between physicians and advanced practice clinicians
Hersh AL , Shapiro DJ , Sanchez GV , Hicks LA . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023 1-3 We compared antibiotic prescribing rates for respiratory conditions in a national sample of outpatient visits from 2010 to 2018 between physicians and advanced practice clinicians (APCs). APCs prescribed antibiotics more frequently than physicians (58% vs 52%), but there were no differences in selection of guideline recommended first-line agents between specialties. |
Characteristics of patients associated with any outpatient antibiotic prescribing among Medicare Part D enrollees, 2007-2018
Kim CY , Gouin KA , Hicks LA , Kabbani S . Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2023 3 (1) e113 The 2007-2018 National Health Interview Survey data linked with Medicare claims were used to examine older adults' characteristics and assess their associations with receiving an antibiotic prescription. This analysis shows variation in antibiotic prescribing among adults enrolled in Medicare Part D by race and ethnicity, sex, geography, and health status. © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, 2023. |
Vaccine Effectiveness of Primary Series and Booster Doses against Omicron Variant COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization in the United States (preprint)
Adams K , Rhoads JP , Surie D , Gaglani M , Ginde AA , McNeal T , Ghamande S , Huynh D , Talbot HK , Casey JD , Mohr NM , Zepeski A , Shapiro NI , Gibbs KW , Files DC , Hicks M , Hager DN , Ali H , Prekker ME , Frosch AE , Exline MC , Gong MN , Mohamed A , Johnson NJ , Srinivasan V , Steingrub JS , Peltan ID , Brown SM , Martin ET , Monto AS , Lauring AS , Khan A , Hough CL , Busse LW , ten Lohuis CC , Duggal A , Wilson JG , Gordon AJ , Qadir N , Chang SY , Mallow C , Rivas C , Babcock HM , Kwon JH , Chappell JD , Halasa N , Grijalva CG , Rice TW , Stubblefield WB , Baughman A , Lindsell CJ , Hart KW , Lester SN , Thornburg NJ , Park S , McMorrow ML , Patel MM , Tenforde MW , Self WH . medRxiv 2022 14 Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of a primary COVID-19 vaccine series plus a booster dose with a primary series alone for the prevention of Omicron variant COVID-19 hospitalization. Design(s): Multicenter observational case-control study using the test-negative design to evaluate vaccine effectiveness (VE). Setting(s): Twenty-one hospitals in the United States (US). Participant(s): 3,181 adults hospitalized with an acute respiratory illness between December 26, 2021 and April 30, 2022, a period of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (BA.1, BA.2) predominance. Participants included 1,572 (49%) case-patients with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 and 1,609 (51%) control patients who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Median age was 64 years, 48% were female, and 21% were immunocompromised; 798 (25%) were vaccinated with a primary series plus booster, 1,326 (42%) were vaccinated with a primary series alone, and 1,057 (33%) were unvaccinated. Main Outcome Measure(s): VE against COVID-19 hospitalization was calculated for a primary series plus a booster and a primary series alone by comparing the odds of being vaccinated with each of these regimens versus being unvaccinated among cases versus controls. VE analyses were stratified by immune status (immunocompetent; immunocompromised) because the recommended vaccine schedules are different for these groups. The primary analysis evaluated all COVID-19 vaccine types combined and secondary analyses evaluated specific vaccine products. Result(s): Among immunocompetent patients, VE against Omicron COVID-19 hospitalization for a primary series plus one booster of any vaccine product dose was 77% (95% CI: 71-82%), and for a primary series alone was 44% (95% CI: 31-54%) (p<0.001). VE was higher for a boosted regimen than a primary series alone for both mRNA vaccines used in the US (BNT162b2: primary series plus booster VE 80% (95% CI: 73-85%), primary series alone VE 46% (95% CI: 30-58%) [p<0.001]; mRNA-1273: primary series plus booster VE 77% (95% CI: 67-83%), primary series alone VE 47% (95% CI: 30-60%) [p<0.001]). Among immunocompromised patients, VE for a primary series of any vaccine product against Omicron COVID-19 hospitalization was 60% (95% CI: 41-73%). Insufficient sample size has accumulated to calculate effectiveness of boosted regimens for immunocompromised patients. Conclusion(s): Among immunocompetent people, a booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine provided additional benefit beyond a primary vaccine series alone for preventing COVID-19 hospitalization due to the Omicron variant. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. |
Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants using traveler-based genomic surveillance at four US airports, September 2021- January 2022 (preprint)
Wegrzyn RD , Appiah GD , Morfino R , Milford SR , Walker AT , Ernst ET , Darrow WW , Li SL , Robison K , MacCannell D , Dai D , Girinathan BP , Hicks AL , Cosca B , Woronoff G , Plocik AM , Simen BB , Moriarty L , Guagliardo SAJ , Cetron MS , Friedman CR . medRxiv 2022 22 Background Despite layered mitigation measures, international travel during the COVID-19 pandemic continues to facilitate global spread of SARS-CoV-2, including novel variants of concern (VOCs). On November 26, 2021, B.1.1.529 (Omicron) was designated as a VOC by the World Health Organization [1]. On December 6, 2021, as part of measures to reduce the introduction and spread of Omicron, the requirement for a negative SARS-CoV-2 test taken before air travel to the United States was shortened from three days to one day pre-departure [1]. Although SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequencing has increased significantly during the pandemic [2], there is still a gap in early detection of emerging variants among arriving travelers. In September 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in collaboration with private partners, implemented a voluntary SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance pilot program. Initially we enrolled arriving air travelers from India. On November 28, we expanded the program to include travelers arriving from countries with high travel volumes, including those where Omicron was first detected. Methods Design, Setting, and Participants During September 29-November 27, 2021, the surveillance program included travelers arriving on seven direct flights from India at three international airports: John F. Kennedy, New York (September 29), Newark Liberty, New Jersey (October 4), and San Francisco, California (October 12). During November 28-January 23, Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, Georgia was added, and participation was offered to travelers from South Africa, Nigeria, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Brazil, arriving on approximately 50 flights per day. Participants were 18 years or older, provided informed consent, and completed demographic, clinical, and travel history questions. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. |
Prescribing of outpatient antibiotics commonly used for respiratory infections among adults before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Brazil
Solanky D , McGovern OL , Edwards JR , Mahon G , Patel TS , Lessa FC , Hicks LA , Patel PK . Clin Infect Dis 2023 77 S12-s19 BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may have impacted outpatient antibiotic prescribing in low- and middle-income countries such as Brazil. However, outpatient antibiotic prescribing in Brazil, particularly at the prescription level, is not well-described. METHODS: We used the IQVIA MIDAS database to characterize changes in prescribing rates of antibiotics commonly prescribed for respiratory infections (azithromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, levofloxacin/moxifloxacin, cephalexin, and ceftriaxone) among adults in Brazil overall and stratified by age and sex, comparing prepandemic (January 2019-March 2020) and pandemic periods (April 2020-December 2021) using uni- and multivariate Poisson regression models. The most common prescribing provider specialties for these antibiotics were also identified. RESULTS: In the pandemic period compared to the prepandemic period, outpatient azithromycin prescribing rates increased across all age-sex groups (incidence rate ratio [IRR] range, 1.474-3.619), with the greatest increase observed in males aged 65-74 years; meanwhile, prescribing rates for amoxicillin-clavulanate and respiratory fluoroquinolones mostly decreased, and changes in cephalosporin prescribing rates varied across age-sex groups (IRR range, 0.134-1.910). For all antibiotics, the interaction of age and sex with the pandemic in multivariable models was an independent predictor of prescribing changes comparing the pandemic versus prepandemic periods. General practitioners and gynecologists accounted for the majority of increases in azithromycin and ceftriaxone prescribing during the pandemic period. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial increases in outpatient prescribing rates for azithromycin and ceftriaxone were observed in Brazil during the pandemic with prescribing rates being disproportionally different by age and sex. General practitioners and gynecologists were the most common prescribers of azithromycin and ceftriaxone during the pandemic, identifying them as potential specialties for antimicrobial stewardship interventions. |
Notes from the field: Comparison of COVID-19 mortality rates among adults aged 65 years who were unvaccinated and those who received a bivalent booster dose within the preceding 6 months - 20 U.S. Jurisdictions, September 18, 2022-April 1, 2023
Johnson AG , Linde L , Payne AB , Ali AR , Aden V , Armstrong B , Armstrong B , Auche S , Bayoumi NS , Bennett S , Boulton R , Chang C , Collingwood A , Cueto K , Davidson SL , Du Y , Fleischauer A , Force V , Frank D , Hamilton R , Harame K , Harrington P , Hicks L , Hodis JD , Hoskins M , Jones A , Kanishka F , Kaur R , Kirkendall S , Khan SI , Klioueva A , Link-Gelles R , Lyons S , Mansfield J , Markelz A , Masarik J 3rd , Mendoza E , Morris K , Omoike E , Paritala S , Patel K , Pike M , Pompa XP , Praetorius K , Rammouni N , Razzaghi H , Riggs A , Shi M , Sigalo N , Stanislawski E , Tilakaratne BP , Turner KA , Wiedeman C , Silk BJ , Scobie HM . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023 72 (24) 667-669 Updated (bivalent) COVID-19 vaccines were first recommended by CDC on September 1, 2022.* An analysis of case and death rates by vaccination status shortly after authorization of bivalent COVID-19 vaccines showed that receipt of a bivalent booster dose provided additional protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated death (1). In this follow-up report on the durability of bivalent booster protection against death among adults aged ≥65 years, mortality rate ratios (RRs) were estimated among unvaccinated persons and those who received a bivalent booster dose by time since vaccination during three periods of Omicron lineage predominance (BA.5 [September 18–November 5, 2022], BQ.1/BQ.1.1 [November 6, 2022–January 21, 2023], and XBB.1.5 [January 22–April 1, 2023]).† | | During September 18, 2022–April 1, 2023, weekly counts of COVID-19–associated deaths§ among unvaccinated persons and those who received a bivalent booster dose¶ were reported from 20 U.S. jurisdictions** that routinely link case surveillance data to immunization registries and vital registration databases (1). Vaccinated persons who did not receive a bivalent COVID-19 booster dose were excluded. Rate denominators were calculated from vaccine administration data and 2019 U.S. intercensal population estimates,†† with numbers of unvaccinated persons estimated by subtracting numbers of vaccinated persons from the 2019 intercensal population estimates, as previously described§§ (1). Average weekly mortality rates were estimated based on date of specimen collection¶¶ during each variant period by vaccination status and time since bivalent booster dose receipt. RRs were calculated by dividing rates among unvaccinated persons by rates among bivalent booster dose recipients; after detrending the underlying linear changes in weekly rates, 95% CIs were estimated from the remaining variation in rates observed*** (1). SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute) and R (version 4.1.2; R Foundation) software were used to conduct all analyses. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.††† |
Implementation of an antibiotic stewardship initiative in a large urgent care network
Stenehjem E , Wallin A , Willis P , Kumar N , Seibert AM , Buckel WR , Stanfield V , Brunisholz KD , Fino N , Samore MH , Srivastava R , Hicks LA , Hersh AL . JAMA Netw Open 2023 6 (5) e2313011 IMPORTANCE: Urgent Care (UC) encounters result in more inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions than other outpatient setting. Few stewardship interventions have focused on UC. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship initiative to reduce antibiotic prescribing for respiratory conditions in a UC network. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study conducted in a UC network with 38 UC clinics and 1 telemedicine clinic included 493 724 total UC encounters. The study compared the antibiotic prescribing rates of all UC clinicians who encountered respiratory conditions for a 12-month baseline period (July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019) with an intervention period (July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020). A sustainability period (July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021) was added post hoc. INTERVENTIONS: Stewardship interventions included (1) education for clinicians and patients, (2) electronic health record (EHR) tools, (3) a transparent clinician benchmarking dashboard, and (4) media. Occurring independently but concurrent with the interventions, a stewardship measure was introduced by UC leadership into the quality measures, including a financial incentive. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the percentage of UC encounters with an antibiotic prescription for a respiratory condition. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic prescribing when antibiotics were not indicated (tier 3 encounters) and first-line antibiotics for acute otitis media, sinusitis, and pharyngitis. Interrupted time series with binomial generalized estimating equations were used to compare periods. RESULTS: The baseline period included 207 047 UC encounters for respiratory conditions (56.8% female; mean [SD] age, 30.0 [21.4] years; 92.0% White race); the intervention period included 183 893 UC encounters (56.4% female; mean [SD] age, 30.7 [20.8] years; 91.2% White race). Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory conditions decreased from 47.8% (baseline) to 33.3% (intervention). During the initial intervention month, a 22% reduction in antibiotic prescribing occurred (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86). Antibiotic prescriptions decreased by 5% monthly during the intervention (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.96). Antibiotic prescribing for tier 3 encounters decreased by 47% (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44-63), and first-line antibiotic prescriptions increased by 18% (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09-1.29) during the initial intervention month. Antibiotic prescriptions for tier 3 encounters decreased by an additional 4% each month (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98), whereas first-line antibiotic prescriptions did not change (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01). Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory conditions remained stable in the sustainability period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this quality improvement study indicated that a UC antibiotic stewardship initiative was associated with decreased antibiotic prescribing for respiratory conditions. This study provides a model for UC antibiotic stewardship. |
Changes in outpatient antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory illnesses, 2011 to 2018
King LM , Tsay SV , Hicks LA , Bizune D , Hersh AL , Fleming-Dutra K . Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2021 1 (1) 1-8 OBJECTIVES: To describe acute respiratory illnesses (ARI) visits and antibiotic prescriptions in 2011 and 2018 across outpatient settings to evaluate progress in reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for ARIs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Outpatient medical and pharmacy claims captured in the IBM MarketScan commercial database, a national convenience sample of privately insured individuals aged <65 years. METHODS: We calculated the annual number of ARI visits and visits with oral antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 enrollees overall and by age category, sex, and setting in 2011 and 2018. We compared these and calculated prevalence rate ratios (PRRs). We adapted existing tiered-diagnosis methodology for International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. RESULTS: In our study population, there were 829 ARI visits per 1,000 enrollees in 2011 compared with 760 ARI visits per 1,000 enrollees in 2018. In 2011, 39.3% of ARI visits were associated with ≥1 oral antibiotic prescription versus 36.2% in 2018. In 2018 compared with 2011, overall ARI visits decreased 8% (PRR, 0.92; 99.99% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.92), whereas visits with antibiotic prescriptions decreased 16% (PRR, 0.84; 99.99% CI, 0.84-0.85). Visits for antibiotic-inappropriate ARIs decreased by 9% (PRR, 0.91; 99.99% CI, 0.91-0.92), and visits with antibiotic prescriptions for these conditions decreased by 32% (PRR, 0.68; 99.99% CI, 0.67-0.68) from 2011 to 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Both the rate of antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 enrollees and the percentage of visits with antibiotic prescriptions decreased modestly from 2011 to 2018 in our study population. These decreases were greatest for antibiotic-inappropriate ARIs; however, additional reductions in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing are needed. |
Antibiotic and opioid prescribing for dental-related conditions in emergency departments: United States, 2012 through 2014
Roberts RM , Bohm MK , Bartoces MG , Fleming-Dutra KE , Hicks LA , Chalmers NI . J Am Dent Assoc 2020 151 (3) 174-181.e1 BACKGROUND: Patients visiting the emergency department (ED) for nontraumatic dental conditions usually receive nondefinitive health care and are referred to treatment elsewhere. This may lead to potentially avoidable antibiotic and opioid use. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in IBM MarketScan Research Databases in Treatment Pathways from 2012 through 2014. This study included patients with commercial insurance or enrolled in Medicaid. Patients receiving a diagnosis of a dental condition in the ED with no secondary diagnosis warranting an antibiotic prescription were included. Patients were stratified on the basis of the primary payer and available demographics, as well as on the basis of repeat visits to the ED. RESULTS: A higher proportion of Medicaid beneficiaries (280,410, 4.9%) had dental-related visits compared with the commercially insured (159,066, 1.3%). The most common diagnoses were similar for both groups and included caries. In both cohorts, the 18- through 34-year age group had the highest rate of dental-related ED visits. Within 7 days of a dental-related ED visit, 54.9% of Medicaid beneficiaries and 55.0% of commercially insured beneficiaries filled a prescription for an antibiotic and 39.6% of Medicaid patients and 42.0% of commercially insured patients filled an opioid prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics and opioids are frequently prescribed during ED visits for dental conditions. Access to preventive and acute oral health care for routine dental symptoms, such as caries, may reduce unnecessary prescriptions in both the commercially insured and Medicaid beneficiary populations. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Treatment of dental conditions in the ED often indicates a lack of access to preventive or acute oral health care. Data-driven solutions, such as guideline implementation, could improve oral health access, reduce medication-related harms, and avert health care expenditures. |
Further Considerations Regarding Duration of Antibiotic Therapy for Sinusitis-Reply
King LM , Hicks LA , Fleming-Dutra KE . JAMA Intern Med 2018 178 (8) 1138-1139 We appreciate the suggestion by Drs. Chang, Fatima, and Stevens in their response to our article, “Antibiotic Therapy Duration in US Adults with Sinusitis.”1 to evaluate prescribing for adults with sinusitis by specialty, particularly since previous studies have found that outpatient antibiotic prescribing practices vary by clinician specialty.2,3 | | We examined the duration of antibiotic courses prescribed for adult acute sinusitis visits to family practice, general practice, geriatrics, internal medicine, pediatrics, emergency medicine, and non-pediatric osteopathic primary care physicians. The non-pediatric osteopathic primary care physician category included both family practice and internal medicine specialties within the dataset, so we were unable to differentiate whether osteopathic medicine clinicians were family practitioners or internists. We described the duration of therapy for all oral antibiotics prescribed for sinusitis and for all oral antibiotics for sinusitis excluding azithromycin. We specifically excluded azithromycin due to its unique pharmacokinetics and persistent tissue concentration; a five-day course of azithromycin is equivalent to a 10-day course of erythromycin.4 In addition, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) clinical practice guidelines specifically recommend against the use of azithromycin in acute sinusitis in adults.5 |
Seroprevalence of high incidence congenital infections among pregnant women in Coatepeque, Guatemala and surrounding areas, 2017-2018
Hicks VJ , Sánchez C , López MR , Gottschlich A , Grajeda LM , Balish A , Gómez A , Nuñez N , Juárez J , López B , Freitas-Ning M , Cordón-Rosales C , Sagastume M , McCracken JP , Espinosa-Bode A , Cadena L , Lo TQ . PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2023 17 (4) e0011248 Maternal infections during pregnancy can potentially cause birth defects and severe adverse effects in infants. From 2017 to 2018, we investigated the seroprevalence of five antibodies among 436 mother-infant pairs enrolled in a pregnancy cohort study in Coatepeque, Guatemala. Upon enrollment (< 20 weeks gestational age) and shortly after delivery, we measured the prevalence of IgG and IgM antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii), rubella, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) in mothers and newborns and used rapid tests to detect HIV and syphilis (Treponema pallidum) in mothers. The mean cohort age was 24.5 years. Maternal T. gondii IgM and IgG seropositivity was 1.9% and 69.7%, respectively. No women were positive for HIV, syphilis, or rubella IgM. Maternal rubella IgG seropositivity was 80.8% and significantly increased with age. Maternal CMV IgM and IgG seropositivity were 2.3% and 99.5%, respectively. Of the 323 women tested at both timepoints, IgM reactivation occurred in one woman for T. gondii infection and in eight for CMV. No newborn was seropositive for CMV IgM or rubella IgM. One newborn was seropositive for T. gondii IgM. Congenital T. gondii and CMV infections are important public health issues for pregnant women, newborns, and healthcare providers in Coatepeque and Guatemala. |
Racial and ethnic disparities in Mpox cases and vaccination among adult males - United States, May-December 2022
Kota KK , Hong J , Zelaya C , Riser AP , Rodriguez A , Weller DL , Spicknall IH , Kriss JL , Lee F , Boersma P , Hurley E , Hicks P , Wilkins C , Chesson H , Concepción-Acevedo J , Ellington S , Belay E , Mermin J . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023 72 (15) 398-403 As of December 31, 2022, a total of 29,939 monkeypox (mpox) cases* had been reported in the United States, 93.3% of which occurred in adult males. During May 10-December 31, 2022, 723,112 persons in the United States received the first dose in a 2-dose mpox (JYNNEOS)(†) vaccination series; 89.7% of these doses were administered to males (1). The current mpox outbreak has disproportionately affected gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) and racial and ethnic minority groups (1,2). To examine racial and ethnic disparities in mpox incidence and vaccination rates, rate ratios (RRs) for incidence and vaccination rates and vaccination-to-case ratios were calculated, and trends in these measures were assessed among males aged ≥18 years (males) (3). Incidence in males in all racial and ethnic minority groups except non-Hispanic Asian (Asian) males was higher than that among non-Hispanic White (White) males. At the peak of the outbreak in August 2022, incidences among non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) and Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic) males were higher than incidence among White males (RR = 6.9 and 4.1, respectively). Overall, vaccination rates were higher among males in racial and ethnic minority groups than among White males. However, the vaccination-to-case ratio was lower among Black (8.8) and Hispanic (16.2) males than among White males (42.5) during the full analytic period, indicating that vaccination rates among Black and Hispanic males were not proportionate to the elevated incidence rates (i.e., these groups had a higher unmet vaccination need). Efforts to increase vaccination among Black and Hispanic males might have resulted in the observed relative increased rates of vaccination; however, these increases were only partially successful in reducing overall incidence disparities. Continued implementation of equity-based vaccination strategies is needed to further increase vaccination rates and reduce the incidence of mpox among all racial and ethnic groups. Recent modeling data (4) showing that, based on current vaccination coverage levels, many U.S. jurisdictions are vulnerable to resurgent mpox outbreaks, underscore the need for continued vaccination efforts, particularly among racial and ethnic minority groups. |
Travel history among persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in the United States, December 2020-February 2021.
Dunajcik A , Haire K , Thomas JD , Moriarty LF , Springer Y , Villanueva JM , MacNeil A , Silk B , Nemhauser JB , Byrkit R , Taylor M , Queen K , Tong S , Lee J , Batra D , Paden C , Henderson T , Kunkes A , Ojo M , Firestone M , Martin Webb L , Freeland M , Brown CM , Williams T , Allen K , Kauerauf J , Wilson E , Jain S , McDonald E , Silver E , Stous S , Wadford D , Radcliffe R , Marriott C , Owes JP , Bart SM , Sosa LE , Oakeson K , Wodniak N , Shaffner J , Brown Q , Westergaard R , Salinas A , Hallyburton S , Ogale Y , Offutt-Powell T , Bonner K , Tubach S , Van Houten C , Hughes V , Reeb V , Galeazzi C , Khuntia S , McGee S , Hicks JT , Dinesh Patel D , Krueger A , Hughes S , Jeanty F , Wang JC , Lee EH , Assanah-Deane T , Tompkins M , Dougherty K , Naqvi O , Donahue M , Frederick J , Abdalhamid B , Powers AM , Anderson M . PLOS Glob Public Health 2023 3 (3) e0001252 The first three SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic lineages classified as variants of concern (VOCs) in the United States (U.S.) from December 15, 2020 to February 28, 2021, Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), and Gamma (P.1) lineages, were initially detected internationally. This investigation examined available travel history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases reported in the U.S. in whom laboratory testing showed one of these initial VOCs. Travel history, demographics, and health outcomes for a convenience sample of persons infected with a SARS-CoV-2 VOC from December 15, 2020 through February 28, 2021 were provided by 35 state and city health departments, and proportion reporting travel was calculated. Of 1,761 confirmed VOC cases analyzed, 1,368 had available data on travel history. Of those with data on travel history, 1,168 (85%) reported no travel preceding laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 and only 105 (8%) reported international travel during the 30 days preceding a positive SARS-CoV-2 test or symptom onset. International travel was reported by 92/1,304 (7%) of persons infected with the Alpha variant, 7/55 (22%) with Beta, and 5/9 (56%) with Gamma. Of the first three SARS-CoV-2 lineages designated as VOCs in the U.S., international travel was common only among the few Gamma cases. Most persons infected with Alpha and Beta variant reported no travel history, therefore, community transmission of these VOCs was likely common in the U.S. by March 2021. These findings underscore the importance of global surveillance using whole genome sequencing to detect and inform mitigation strategies for emerging SARS-CoV-2 VOCs. |
Using antenatal care as a platform for malaria surveillance data collection: study protocol
Gutman JR , Mwesigwa JN , Arnett K , Kangale C , Aaron S , Babarinde D , Buekens J , Candrinho B , Debe S , Digre P , Drake M , Gansané A , Gogue C , Griffith KS , Hicks J , Kinda R , Koenker H , Lemwayi R , Munsey A , Obi E , Ogouyèmi-Hounto A , Okoko OO , Onikpo F , Onoja A , Porter T , Savaio B , Tynuv K , Uhomoibhi P , Wagman J , Wolf K , Zulliger R , Walker P , Miller JM , Robertson M . Malar J 2023 22 (1) 99 BACKGROUND: While many malaria-endemic countries have health management information systems that can measure and report malaria trends in a timely manner, these routine systems have limitations. Periodic community cross-sectional household surveys are used to estimate malaria prevalence and intervention coverage but lack geographic granularity and are resource intensive. Incorporating malaria testing for all women at their first antenatal care (ANC) visit (i.e., ANC1) could provide a more timely and granular source of data for monitoring trends in malaria burden and intervention coverage. This article describes a protocol designed to assess if ANC-based surveillance could be a pragmatic tool to monitor malaria. METHODS: This is an observational, cross-sectional study conducted in Benin, Burkina Faso, Mozambique, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Zambia. Pregnant women attending ANC1 in selected health facilities will be tested for malaria infection by rapid diagnostic test and administered a brief questionnaire to capture key indicators of malaria control intervention coverage and care-seeking behaviour. In each location, contemporaneous cross-sectional household surveys will be leveraged to assess correlations between estimates obtained using each method, and the use of ANC data as a tool to track trends in malaria burden and intervention coverage will be validated. RESULTS: This study will assess malaria prevalence at ANC1 aggregated at health facility and district levels, and by gravidity relative to current pregnancy (i.e., gravida 1, gravida 2, and gravida 3 +). ANC1 malaria prevalence will be presented as monthly trends. Additionally, correlation between ANC1 and household survey-derived estimates of malaria prevalence, bed net ownership and use, and care-seeking will be assessed. CONCLUSION: ANC1-based surveillance has the potential to provide a cost-effective, localized measure of malaria prevalence that is representative of the general population and useful for tracking monthly changes in parasite prevalence, as well as providing population-representative estimates of intervention coverage and care-seeking behavior. This study will evaluate the representativeness of these measures and collect information on operational feasibility, usefulness for programmatic decision-making, and potential for scale-up of malaria ANC1 surveillance. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:May 06, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure